IITJEE Advanced Mathematics « Mathematics Hothouse

Category Archives: IITJEE Advanced Mathematics

You and your research ( You and your studies) : By Richard Hamming, AT and T, Bell Labs mathematician;

August 18, 2019 – 1:38 am

Although the title is grand (and quite aptly so)…the reality is that it can be applied to serious studies for IITJEE entrance, CMI entrance, highly competitive math olympiads, and also competitive coding contests…in fact, to various aspects of student life and various professional lifes…

Please read the whole article…apply it wholly or partially…modified or unmodified to your studies/research/profession…these are broad principles of success…

https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in careers in mathematics, Cnennai Math Institute Entrance Exam, IITJEE Foundation Math IITJEE Main and Advanced Math and RMO/INMO of (TIFR and Homibhabha), IITJEE Foundation mathematics, IITJEE Mains, Information about IITJEE Examinations, INMO, ISI Kolkatta Entrance Exam, KVPY, mathematicians, memory power concentration retention, miscellaneous, motivational stuff, time management | Comments (0)

B.S. in Mathematics: IIT Bombay program:

May 1, 2018 – 5:30 pm

http://www.math.iitb.ac.in/Academics/bs_programme.php

Note that the admission is through IITJEE Advanced only.

–Nalin Pithwa.

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in applications of maths, careers in mathematics, Information about IITJEE Examinations, mathematicians, pure mathematics | Tagged IIT Bombay BS in Mathematics through IITJEE Advanced | Comments (0)

Co-ordinate Geometry : IITJEE Mains practice: some random problems again

March 13, 2018 – 12:35 pm

Problem 1:

The line $Ax+By+C=0$ cuts the circle $x^{2}+y^{2}+ax+by+c=0$ at P and Q. The line $A^{'}x+B^{'}y+C^{'}=0$ cuts the circle $x^{2}+y^{2}+a^{'}x+b^{'}y+c^{'}=0$ at R and S. If P, Q, R and S are concyclic, prove that

$\left | \begin{array}{ccc} a-a^{'} & b-b^{'} & c-c^{'} \\ A & B & C \\ A^{'} & B^{'} & C^{'} \end{array}\right |=0$ .

Solution I;

An equation of a circle through P and Q is $x^{2}+y^{2}+ax+by+c +\lambda (Ax+By+C)=0$ …call this equation I.

And, an equation of a circle through R and S is $x^{2}+y^{2}+a^{'}x+b^{'}y + c^{'}+\mu (A^{'}x+B^{'}y+C^{'})=0$ …call this equation II.

If P, Q, R and S are concyclic, then I and II represent the same circle for same values of $\lambda$ and $\mu$ .

$\Longrightarrow a+ \lambda A=a^{'}+\mu A^{'}$ or $a-a^{'} + \lambda A - \mu A^{'}=0$

so also,

$b + \lambda B = b^{'} + \mu B^{'}$ or $b-b^{'}+\lambda B - \mu B^{'}=0$

$c + \lambda C = c^{'} + \mu C^{'}$ or $c-c^{'} + \lambda C - \mu C^{'}=0$ .

Eliminating $\lambda$ and $\mu$ , we get the following:

$\left | \begin{array}{ccc} a-a^{'} & A & -A^{'}\\ b-b^{'} & B & -B^{'}\\ c-c^{'} & C & -C^{'} \end{array} \right |=0$ , that is,

$\left | \begin{array}{ccc} a-a^{'} & b-b^{'} & c-c^{'} \\ A & B & C \\ A^{'} & B^{'} & C^{'} \end{array}\right |=0$

Problem II:

A straight line is such that the algebraic sum of the perpendiculars falling upon it from any number of fixed points is zero. Show that it always passes through a fixed point.

Solution II:

Let $(x_{i},y_{i})$ where $i=1,2,3,\ldots$ be n fixed points. Let $ax+by+c=0$ be the given line. Thus, as per given hypthesis, we have

$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{ax{i}+by_{i}+c}{\sqrt{(a^{2}+b^{2})}}=0 \Longrightarrow a\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}+b\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i}+nc=0 \Longrightarrow a\overline{x}+b\overline{y}+c=0$ where $\overline{x}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}$ and $\overline{y}=\frac{}{}\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i}$

which shows that the given line passes through the fixed point $(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}, \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i})$ .

Problem III:

The straight lines $L \equiv ax+by+c=0$ and $L_{1} \equiv a_{1}x+b_{1}y+c_{1}=0$ are intersecting. Find the straight line $L_{2}$ such that L is the bisector of the angle between $L_{1}$ and $L_{2}$ .

Solution III:

Let the equation of the line $L_{2}$ be $L_{1}+ \lambda L=0 \Longrightarrow (a_{1}+\lambda a)x+(b_{1}+\lambda b)y+\lambda c=0$ where the slopes of $L_{2}, L, L_{1}$ are respectively

$-\frac{a_{1}+\lambda a}{b_{1}+\lambda b}, \frac{-a}{b}, -\frac{a_{1}}{b_{1}}$ .

Since L is the bisector of the angle between $L_{2}$ and $L_{1}$ we have

$\frac{-(\frac{a_{1}+\lambda a}{b_{1}+\lambda b})+\frac{a}{b}}{1+\frac{a(a_{1}+\lambda a)}{b(b_{1}+\lambda b)}}=\frac{-\frac{a}{b}+\frac{a_{1}}{b_{1}}}{1+\frac{aa_{1}}{bb_{1}}}$

$\Longrightarrow \frac{-b(a_{1}+\lambda a)+a(a_{1}+\lambda b)}{b(b_{1}+\lambda b)+a(a_{1}+\lambda a)}=-\frac{ab_{1}-a_{1}b}{aa_{1}+bb_{1}}$

$\Longrightarrow \frac{ab_{1}-a_{1}b}{\lambda (a^{2}+b^{2})+aa_{1}+bb_{1}} = -\frac{ab_{1}-a_{1}b}{aa_{1}+bb_{1}}$

$\Longrightarrow \lambda = - \frac{2(aa_{1}+bb_{1})}{a^{2}+b^{2}}$

Hence, the equation of the required line $L_{1}$ is $(a^{2}+b^{2})(a_{1}x+b_{1}y+c_{1})=2(aa_{1}+bb_{1})(ax+by+c)$ .

Problem IV:

If a, b are real numbers and $c>0$ , find the locus represented by $|ay-bx|=c\sqrt{(x-a)^{2}+(y-b)^{2}}$ .

PS: Please draw a right angled triangle PMA, with right angle at M, and P being $(x,y)$ and A being $(a,b)$ .

Solution IV:

Let $x=a+r\cos {\theta}$ and $y=b+r\sin {\theta}$ , then the given equation becomes $a\sin {\theta}-b\cos {\theta}=c$ .

$\Longrightarrow r\sin{(\theta-\alpha)}=c$ where $r=\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}$ and $\tan {(\alpha)}=\frac{b}{a}$ which is the slope of $ay-bx$ , which in turn implies $\frac{c}{r}=\sin (\theta -\alpha) \leq 1$

$\Longrightarrow c \leq r$ , or $c \leq \sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}$ . The given equation now becomes

$\frac{|ay-bx|}{\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}}=\frac{c}{\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}}\sqrt{(x-a)^{2}+(y-b)^{2}}$ ….call this as relation I.

If M is the foot of the perpendicular from a point P(x,y) on the line $ay-bx=0$ and A is the point $(a,b)$ which clearly lies on this line, then from relation I, we have

$\frac{PM}{PA}=\frac{c}{\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}}=\sin {(\theta - \alpha)}$ . Hence, the locus of P is a straight line through the point $(a,b)$ inclined at an angle $\arcsin {\frac{c}{\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}}}$ with the line $ay-bx=0$ .

Problem V:

Find the co-ordinates of the orthocentre of the triangle formed by the lines $y=0$ and $(1+t)x-ty+t(1+t)=0$ and $(1+u)x-uy+u(1+u)=0$ , where $t \neq u$ , and show that for all values of t and u, the orthocentre lies on the line $x+y=0$ .

Solution V:

Let the equation of the side BC be $y=0$ . Then, the coordinates of B and C are $(-t,0)$ and $(-u,0)$ , respectively, where $(1+t)x-ty+t(1+t)=0$ and $(1+u)x-uy+u(1+u)=0$ are equations of AB and AC, respectively.

PS: Please draw the diagram on your own for a better understanding of the solution presented.

Now, equation of BE is $y={\frac{-u}{1+u}}(x+t)$ …let us call this equaiton I.

And, equation of CF is $y=\frac{-t}{1+t}(x+u)$ …let us call this equation II.

Solving I and II, we get the following:

$x(\frac{u}{1+u}-\frac{t}{1+t})=\frac{tu}{1+t}-\frac{tu}{1+u}$ , which in turn implies that

$x=tu$ and $y=-tu$ , so that the orthocentre is the point $(tu,-tu)$ which lies on the line $x+y=0$ .

Cheers,

Nalin Pithwa

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in co-ordinate geometry, IITJEE Mains | Comments (1)

Solutions to Birthday Problems: IITJEE Advanced Mathematics

May 23, 2017 – 9:04 pm

In the following problems, each year is assumed to be consisting of 365 days (no leap year):

Problem 1:

What is the least number of people in a room such that it is more likely than not that at least two people will share the same birthday?

Solution 1:

The probability of the second person having a different birthday from the first person is $\frac{364}{365}$ . The probability of the first three persons having different birthdays is $\frac{364}{365} \times \frac{363}{365}$ . In this way, the probability of all n persons in a room having different birthdays is $P(n) = \frac{364}{365} \times \frac{363}{365} \times \frac{362}{365} \times \ldots \frac{365-n+1}{365}$ . For the value of n, when P(n) falls just below 1/2 is the least number of people in a room when the probability of at least two people having the same birthday becomes greater than one half (that is, more likely than not). Now, one can make the following table:

$\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\hline N & P(n) \\ \hline 2 & 364/365 \\ \hline 3 & 0.9918 \\ \hline 4 & 0.9836 \\ \hline 5 & 0.9729 \\ \hline 6 & 0.9595 \\ \hline 7 & 0.9438 \\ \hline 8 & 0.9257 \\ \hline 9 & 0.9054 \\ \hline 10 & 0.8830 \\ \hline 11 & 0.8589 \\ \hline 12 & 0.8330 \\ \hline 13 & 0.8056 \\ \hline 14 & 0.7769 \\ \hline 15 & 0.7471 \\ \hline 16 & 0.7164 \\ \hline 17 & 0.6850 \\ \hline 18 &0.6531 \\ \hline 19 & 0.6209 \\ \hline 20 & 0.5886 \\ \hline 21 & 0.5563 \\ \hline 22 & 0.5258 \\ \hline 23 & 0.4956 \\ \hline \end{tabular}$

Thus, the answer is 23. One may say that during a football match with one referee, it is more likely than not that at least two people on the field have the same birthday! 🙂 🙂 🙂

Problem 2:

You are in a conference. What is the least number of people in the conference (besides you) such that it is more likely than not that there is at least another person having the same birthday as yours?

Solution 2:

The probability of the first person having a different birthday from yours is $\frac{364}{365}$ . Similarly, the probability of the first two persons not having the same birthday as yours is $\frac{(364)^{2}}{(365)^{2}}$ . Thus, the probability of n persons not having the same birthday as yours is $\frac{(364)^{n}}{(365)^{n}}$ . When this value falls below 0.5, then it becomes more likely than not that at least another person has the same birthday as yours. So, the least value of n is obtained from $(\frac{364}{365})^{n}<\frac{1}{2}$ . Taking log of both sides, we solve to get $n>252.65$ . So, the least number of people required is 253.

Problem 3:

A theatre owner announces that the first person in the queue having the same birthday as the one who has already purchased a ticket will be given a free entry. Where (which position in the queue) should one stand to maximize the chance of earning a free entry?

Solution 3:

For the nth person to earn a free entry, first $(n-1)$ persons must have different birthdays and the nth person must have the same birthday as that of one of these previous $(n-1)$ persons. The probability of such an event can we written as

$P(n) = [\frac{364}{365} \times \frac{363}{365} \times \frac{362}{365} \times \ldots \frac{365-n+2}{365}] \times \frac{n-1}{365}$

For a maximum, we need $P(n) > P(n+1)$ . Alternatively, $\frac{P(n)}{P(n+1)} >1$ . Using this expression for P(n), we get $\frac{365}{365-n} \times \frac{n-1}{n} >1$ . Or, $n^{2}-n-365>0$ . For positive n, this inequality is satisfied first for some n between 19 and 20. So, the best place in the queue to get a free entry is the 20th position.

More later,

Nalin Pithwa.

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in ISI Kolkatta Entrance Exam, probability theory | Comments (0)

Birthday Probability Problems: IITJEE Advanced Mathematics

May 23, 2017 – 1:35 am

In the following problems, each year is assumed to be consisting of 365 days (no leap year):

What is the least number of people in a room such that it is more likely than not that at least two people will share the same birthday?
You are in a conference. What is the least number of people in the conference (besides you) such that it is more likely than not that there is at least another person having the same birthday as yours?
A theatre owner announces that the first person in the queue having the same birthday as the one who has already purchased a ticket will be given a free entry. Where (which position in the queue) should one stand to maximize the chance of earning a free entry?

I will put up the solutions on this blog tomorrow. First, you need to make a whole-hearted attempt.

Nalin Pithwa.

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in applications of maths, probability theory | Comments (0)

Limits that arise frequently

February 23, 2017 – 7:18 pm

We continue our presentation of basic stuff from Calculus and Analytic Geometry, G B Thomas and Finney, Ninth Edition. My express purpose in presenting these few proofs is to emphasize that Calculus, is not just a recipe of calculation techniques. Or, even, a bit further, math is not just about calculation. I have a feeling that such thinking nurtured/developed at a young age, (while preparing for IITJEE Math, for example) makes one razor sharp.

We verify a few famous limits.

Formula 1:

If $|x|<1$ , $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}x^{n}=0$

We need to show that to each $\in >0$ there corresponds an integer N so large that $|x^{n}|<\in$ for all n greater than N. Since $\in^{1/n}\rightarrow 1$ , while $|x|<1$ . there exists an integer N for which $\in^{1/n}>|x|$ . In other words,

$|x^{N}|=|x|^{N}<\in$ . Call this (I).

This is the integer we seek because, if $|x|<1$ , then

$|x^{n}|<|x^{N}|$ for all $n>N$ . Call this (II).

Combining I and II produces $|x^{n}|<\in$ for all $n>N$ , concluding the proof.

Formula II:

For any number x, $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}(1+\frac{x}{n})^{n}=e^{x}$ .

Let $a_{n}=(1+\frac{x}{n})^{n}$ . Then, $\ln {a_{n}}=\ln{(1+\frac{x}{n})^{n}}=n\ln{(1+\frac{x}{n})}\rightarrow x$ ,

as we can see by the following application of l’Hopital’s rule, in which we differentiate with respect to n:

$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}n\ln{(1+\frac{x}{n})}=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{\ln{(1+x/n)}}{1/n}$ , which in turn equals

$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{(\frac{1}{1+x/n}).(-\frac{x}{n^{2}})}{-1/n^{2}}=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{x}{1+x/n}=x$ .

Now, let us apply the following theorem with $f(x)=e^{x}$ to the above:

(a theorem for calculating limits of sequences) the continuous function theorem for sequences:

Let $a_{n}$ be a sequence of real numbers. If $\{a_{n}\}$ be a sequence of real numbers. If $a_{n} \rightarrow L$ and if f is a function that is continu0us at L and defined at all $a_{n}$ , then $f(a_{n}) \rightarrow f(L)$ .

So, in this particular proof, we get the following:

$(1+\frac{x}{n})^{n}=a_{n}=e^{\ln{a_{n}}}\rightarrow e^{x}$ .

Formula 3:

For any number x, $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{x^{n}}{n!}=0$

Since $-\frac{|x|^{n}}{n!} \leq \frac{x^{n}}{n!} \leq \frac{|x|^{n}}{n!}$ ,

all we need to show is that $\frac{|x|^{n}}{n!} \rightarrow 0$ . We can then apply the Sandwich Theorem for Sequences (Let $\{a_{n}\}$ , $\{b_{n}\}$ and $\{c_{n}\}$ be sequences of real numbers. if $a_{n}\leq b_{n}\leq c_{n}$ holds for all n beyond some index N, and if $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}c_{n}=L$ ,, then $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}b_{n}=L$ also) to conclude that $\frac{x^{n}}{n!} \rightarrow 0$ .

The first step in showing that $|x|^{n}/n! \rightarrow 0$ is to choose an integer $M>|x|$ , so that $(|x|/M)<1$ . Now, let us the rule (formula 1, mentioned above), so we conclude that: $(|x|/M)^{n}\rightarrow 0$ . We then restrict our attention to values of $n>M$ . For these values of n, we can write:

$\frac{|x|^{n}}{n!}=\frac{|x|^{n}}{1.2 \ldots M.(M+1)(M+2)\ldots n}$ , where there are $(n-M)$ factors in the expression $(M+1)(M+2)\ldots n$ , and

the RHS in the above expression is $\leq \frac{|x|^{n}}{M!M^{n-M}}=\frac{|x|^{n}M^{M}}{M!M^{n}}=\frac{M^{M}}{M!}(\frac{|x|}{M})^{n}$ . Thus,

$0\leq \frac{|x|^{n}}{n!}\leq \frac{M^{M}}{M!}(\frac{|x|}{M})^{n}$ . Now, the constant $\frac{M^{M}}{M!}$ does not change as n increases. Thus, the Sandwich theorem tells us that $\frac{|x|^{n}}{n!} \rightarrow 0$ because $(\frac{|x|}{M})^{n}\rightarrow 0$ .

That’s all, folks !!

Aufwiedersehen,

Nalin Pithwa.

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in calculus, Cnennai Math Institute Entrance Exam, pure mathematics | Tagged advanced calculus | Comments (0)

Cauchy’s Mean Value Theorem and the Stronger Form of l’Hopital’s Rule

February 12, 2017 – 5:26 am

Reference: Thomas, Finney, 9th edition, Calculus and Analytic Geometry.

Continuing our previous discussion of “theoretical” calculus or “rigorous” calculus, I am reproducing below the proof of the finite limit case of the stronger form of l’Hopital’s Rule :

L’Hopital’s Rule (Stronger Form):

Suppose that

$f(x_{0})=g(x_{0})=0$

and that the functions f and g are both differentiable on an open interval $(a,b)$ that contains the point $x_{0}$ . Suppose also that $g^{'} \neq 0$ at every point in $(a,b)$ except possibly at $x_{0}$ . Then,

$\lim_{x \rightarrow x_{0}}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\lim_{x \rightarrow x_{0}}\frac{f^{x}}{g^{x}}$ ….call this equation I,

provided the limit on the right exists.

The proof of the stronger form of l’Hopital’s Rule is based on Cauchy’s Mean Value Theorem, a mean value theorem that involves two functions instead of one. We prove Cauchy’s theorem first and then show how it leads to l’Hopital’s Rule.

Cauchy’s Mean Value Theorem:

Suppose that the functions f and g are continuous on $[a,b]$ and differentiable throughout $(a,b)$ and suppose also that $g^{'} \neq 0$ throughout $(a,b)$ . Then there exists a number c in $(a,b)$ at which

$\frac{f^{'}(c)}{g^{'}(c)} = \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{g(b)-g(a)}$ …call this II.

The ordinary Mean Value Theorem is the case where $g(x)=x$ .

Proof of Cauchy’s Mean Value Theorem:

We apply the Mean Value Theorem twice. First we use it to show that $g(a) \neq g(b)$ . For if $g(b)$ did equal to $g(a)$ , then the Mean Value Theorem would give:

$g^{'}(c)=\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}=0$ for some c between a and b. This cannot happen because $g^{'}(x) \neq 0$ in $(a,b)$ .

We next apply the Mean Value Theorem to the function:

$F(x) = f(x)-f(a)-\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{g(b)-g(a)}[g(x)-g(a)]$ .

This function is continuous and differentiable where f and g are, and $F(b) = F(a)=0$ . Therefore, there is a number c between a and b for which $F^{'}(c)=0$ . In terms of f and g, this says:

$F^{'}(c) = f^{'}(c)-\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{g(b)-g(a)}[g^{'}(c)]=0$ , or

$\frac{f^{'}(c)}{g^{'}(c)}=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{g(b)-g(a)}$ , which is II above. QED.

Proof of the Stronger Form of l’Hopital’s Rule:

We first prove I for the case $x \rightarrow x_{o}^{+}$ . The method needs no change to apply to $x \rightarrow x_{0}^{-}$ , and the combination of those two cases establishes the result.

Suppose that x lies to the right of $x_{o}$ . Then, $g^{'}(x) \neq 0$ and we can apply the Cauchy’s Mean Value Theorem to the closed interval from $x_{0}$ to x. This produces a number c between $x_{0}$ and x such that $\frac{f^{'}(c)}{g^{'}(c)}=\frac{f(x)-f(x_{0})}{g(x)-g(x_{0})}$ .

But, $f(x_{0})=g(x_{0})=0$ so that $\frac{f^{'}(c)}{g^{'}(c)}=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$ .

As x approaches $x_{0}$ , c approaches $x_{0}$ because it lies between x and $x_{0}$ . Therefore, $\lim_{x \rightarrow x_{0}^{+}}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\lim_{x \rightarrow x_{0}^{+}}\frac{f^{'}(c)}{g^{'}(c)}=\lim_{x \rightarrow x_{0}^{+}}\frac{f^{'}(x)}{g^{'}(x)}$ .

This establishes l’Hopital’s Rule for the case where x approaches $x_{0}$ from above. The case where x approaches $x_{0}$ from below is proved by applying Cauchy’s Mean Value Theorem to the closed interval $[x,x_{0}]$ , where $x< x_{0}$ . QED.

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in calculus, Cnennai Math Institute Entrance Exam, pure mathematics | Comments (0)

The Sandwich Theorem or Squeeze Play Theorem

February 5, 2017 – 10:05 am

It helps to think about the core concepts of Calculus from a young age, if you want to develop your expertise or talents further in math, pure or applied, engineering or mathematical sciences. At a tangible level, it helps you attack more or many questions of the IIT JEE Advanced Mathematics. Let us see if you like the following proof, or can absorb/digest it:

Reference: Calculus and Analytic Geometry by Thomas and Finney, 9th edition.

The Sandwich Theorem:

Suppose that $g(x) \leq f(x) \leq h(x)$ for all x in some open interval containing c, except possibly at $x=c$ itself. Suppose also that $\lim_{x \rightarrow c}g(x)= \lim_{x \rightarrow c}h(x)=L$ . Then, $\lim_{x \rightarrow c}f(x)=c$ .

Proof for Right Hand Limits:

Suppose $\lim_{x \rightarrow c^{+}}g(x)=\lim_{x \rightarrow c^{+}}h(x)=L$ . Then, for any $\in >0$ , there exists a $\delta >0$ such that for all x, the inequality $c<x<c+\delta$ implies $L-\in<g(x)<L+\in$ and $L-\in<h(x)<L+\in$ ….call this (I)

These inequalities combine with the inequality $g(x) \leq f(x) \leq h(x)$ to give

$L-\in <g(x) \leq f(x) \leq h(x)<L+\in$

$L-\in <f(x)<L+\in$

$-\in <f(x)-L<\in$ ….call this (II)

Therefore, for all x, the inequality $c<x<c+\delta$ implies $|f(x)-L|<\in$ . …call this (III)

Proof for LeftHand Limits:

Suppose $\lim_{x \rightarrow c^{-}} g(x)=\lim_{x \rightarrow c^{-}}=L$ . Then, for $\in >0$ there exists a $\delta >0$ such that for all x, the inequality $c-\delta <x<c$ implies $L-\in<g(x)<L+\in$ and $L-\in<h(x)<L+\in$ …call this (IV).

We conclude as before that for all x, $c-\delta <x<c$ implies $|f(x)-L|<\in$ .

Proof for Two sided Limits:

If $\lim_{x \rightarrow c}g(x) = \lim_{x \rightarrow c}h(x)=L$ , then $g(x)$ and $h(x)$ both approach L as $x \rightarrow c^{+}$ and as $x \rightarrow c^{-}$ so $\lim_{x \rightarrow c^{+}}f(x)=L$ and $\lim_{x \rightarrow c^{-}}f(x)=L$ . Hence, $\lim_{x \rightarrow c}f(x)=L$ . QED.

Let me know your feedback on such stuff,

Nalin Pithwa

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in Cnennai Math Institute Entrance Exam, pure mathematics | Comments (0)

Maxima and Minima using calculus

May 28, 2016 – 4:41 pm

Problem:

The vertices of an $(n+1)$ -gon lie on the sides of a regular n-gon and divide its perimeter into parts of equal length. How should one construct the $(n+1)-$ gon so that its area is :

(a) maximum

(b) minimum

Hint only:

[One of the golden rule of solving problems in math/physics is to draw diagrams, as had benn emphasized by the maverick American physics Nobel Laureate, Richard Feynman. He expounded this technique even in software development. So, in the present problem, first draw several diagrams.]

There exists a side $B_{1}B_{2}$ of the $(n+1)$ -gon that lies entirely on a side $A_{1}A_{2}$ of the n-gon. Let $b=B_{1}B_{2}$ and $b=A_{1}A_{2}$ . Show that $b=\frac{n}{n+1}a$ . Then, for $x=A_{1}B_{1}$ , we have $0 \leq x \leq \frac{n}{n+1}$ and the area S of the $(n+1)$ -gon is given by

$S(x)=\frac{\sin{\phi}}{2}\Sigma_{i=1}^{n}(\frac{i-1}{n+1}a+x)(\frac{n-i+1}{n+1}a-x)$

where $\phi=\angle{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}$ . Thus, $S(x)$ is a quadratic function of x. Show that $S(x)$ is a minimal when $x=0$ or $x=\frac{a}{n+1}$ and $S(x)$ is maximal when $x=\frac{a}{2(n+1)}$ .

Let me know if you have any trouble when you attempt it,

-Nalin Pithwa

By Nalin Pithwa | Also posted in calculus, Cnennai Math Institute Entrance Exam, ISI Kolkatta Entrance Exam | Tagged optimization | Comments (0)

Triangle inequality and max-min

May 19, 2016 – 7:35 am

Here is a problem I culled from Prof. Titu Andreescu’s literature (Geometric maxima and minima) for IITJEE Mathematics:

Problem:

Find the greatest real number k such that for any triple of positive numbers a, b, c such that $kabc > a^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3}$ , there exists a triangle with side lengths a, b, c.

Solution:

We have to find the greatest real number k such that for any a, b, $c > 0$ with $a + b \leq c$ , we have $kabc \leq a^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3}$ . First take $b=a$ and $c=2a$ . Then, $2ka^{3} \leq 10a^{3}$ , that is, $k \leq 5$ . Conversely, let $k=5$ . Set $c=a+b+x$ , where $x \geq 0$ . Then,