
Pages

Categories
 algebra
 applications of maths
 Basic Set Theory and Logic
 calculus
 careers in mathematics
 Cnennai Math Institute Entrance Exam
 coordinate geometry
 combinatorics or permutations and combinations
 Complex Numbers
 Fun with Mathematics
 geometry
 IITJEE Advanced
 IITJEE Advanced Mathematics
 IITJEE Foundation Math IITJEE Main and Advanced Math and RMO/INMO of (TIFR and Homibhabha)
 IITJEE Foundation mathematics
 IITJEE Mains
 IMO International Mathematical Olympiad IMU
 Inequalities
 Information about IITJEE Examinations
 INMO
 ISI Kolkatta Entrance Exam
 KVPY
 mathematicians
 memory power concentration retention
 miscellaneous
 motivational stuff
 physicisrs
 PreRMO
 probability theory
 pure mathematics
 RMO
 RMO Number Theory
 Statistics
 time management
 Trigonometry

Archives
 September 2020
 August 2020
 July 2020
 June 2020
 May 2020
 April 2020
 March 2020
 February 2020
 January 2020
 December 2019
 November 2019
 October 2019
 September 2019
 August 2019
 June 2019
 May 2019
 March 2019
 February 2019
 January 2019
 November 2018
 October 2018
 September 2018
 August 2018
 July 2018
 June 2018
 May 2018
 April 2018
 March 2018
 February 2018
 January 2018
 December 2017
 November 2017
 October 2017
 September 2017
 August 2017
 July 2017
 June 2017
 May 2017
 April 2017
 March 2017
 February 2017
 January 2017
 November 2016
 October 2016
 September 2016
 August 2016
 July 2016
 June 2016
 May 2016
 April 2016
 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 December 2015
 November 2015
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 April 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 July 2014
 June 2014
Category Archives: applications of maths
B.S. in Mathematics: IIT Bombay program:
http://www.math.iitb.ac.in/Academics/bs_programme.php
Note that the admission is through IITJEE Advanced only.
–Nalin Pithwa.
Fourier Transformation in Data Science
John Conway, Simons Foundation, Science Lives, Mathematics, Mathematicians
The Greatest Auction Ever Held
Reference: A Beautiful Mind by Sylvia Nasar.
**************************************************
Washington, D.C., December 1994:
On the afternoon of December 5, 1994, John Nash was riding in a taxi headed to Newark Airport on his way to Stockholm, where he would, in a few days time, receive from the King of Sweden the gold medal engraved with the portrait of Alfred Nobel. At around the same time, a few hundred miles in the south, in downtown Washington, D.C., Vice President Al Gore was announcing with great fanfare the opening of the “greatest auction ever.”
There was, as The New York Times would later report, no fasttalking auctioneer, no banging gavel, no Old Masters. On the auction block was thin air — airwaves that could be used for the new wireless gadgets like telephones, pagers, faxes — worth billions and billions of dollars, enough licenses for every major American city to have three competing cellular phone services. In the secret war rooms and building booths were CEOs of the world’s biggest communications conglomerates — and unlikely group of blue sky economic theoreticians who were advising them.When the auction finally closed the following March, the winning bids totaled more than $7 billion making it the biggest sale in American history of public assets and one of the most successful (and lucrative) applications of economic theory to public policy ever. Michael Rothschild, dean of Princeton’s Woodrow Wilson School, later called it “a demonstration that people thinking hard about a problem can make the world work better…a triumph of pure thought.”
The juxtaposition of Gore and Nash, the hightech auction and the medieval pomp of the Nobel ceremony, was hardly an accident. The FCC auction was designed by young economists who were using tools created by John Nash, John Harsanyi and Reinhard Selten. Their ideas were specifically designed for analyzing rivalry and cooperation among a small number of rational players with a mix of conflicting and similar interests: people, governments, and corporations — and even animal species.
The prize itself was a long overdue acknowledgement by the Nobel committee that a sea change in economics, one that had been underway for more than a decade, had taken place. As a discipline, economics had long been dominated by Adam Smith’s brilliant metophor of the Invisible Hand. Smith’s concept of perfect competition envisions so many buyers and sellers that no single buyer or seller has to worry about the reactions of others. It is a powerful idea, one that predicted how freemarket economies would evolve and gave policymakers a guide for encouraging growth and dividing the economic pie fairly. But in the world of megamergers, big government, massive foreign direct investment, and wholesale privatization, where the game is played by a handful of players, each taking into account the others’ actions, each pursuing his own best strategies, game theory has come to the fore.
After decades of resistance — Paul Samuelson used to joke about “the swamp of nperson game theory” — a younger generation of theorists began using game theory in areas from trade to industrial organization to public finance in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. Game theory opened up “terrain for systematic thinking that was previously closed.” Indeed, as game theory and information economics have become increasingly entwined, markets traditionally seen as fitting the purely competitive mold have increasingly been studied using game theory assumptions. The latest generation of texts used in top graduate schools today all recast the basic theories of the firm and the consumer, the foundation of economics, in terms of strategic games. “Concepts, terminology and models from game theory have come to dominate many areas of economics,” said Avinash Dixit, an economist at Princeton who uses game theory in work on international trade and is the author of Thinking Strategically. “At last we are seeing the realization of the true potential of the revolution launched by von Neumann and Morgenstern.” And because most economic applications of game theory use the Nash equilibrium concept, “Nash is the point of departure.”
The revolution has gone far beyond research journals, experimental laboratories at Caltech and the University of Pittsburgh, and classrooms of elite business schools and universities. The current generation of economic policymakers — including Lawrence Summers, undersecretary of the treasury, Joseph Stiglitz, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, and VicePresident Al Gore — are steeped in the stuff, which they say, is useful for thinking about everything from budget proposals to Federal Reserve policy to pollution cleanups.
The most dramatic use of game theory is by governments from Australia to Mexico to sell scarce public resources to buyers best able to develop them. The radio spectrum, Tbills, oil leases, timber, and pollution rights are now sold in auctions designed by game theorists — with far greater success than that of earlier policies.
Economists like Nobel Laureate Ronald Coase have advocated the use of auctions by government since the 1950’s. Auctions have long been used in markets where sellers of unusual items — from vintage wines to movie rights — have no idea what bidders are willing to pay. Their basic purpose is to make bidders reveal how much they value the item. But the arguments of Coase and others were stated in abstract, entirely theoretical terms, and little thought was given to how such auctions would actually be conducted. Congress remained skeptical.
Before 1994, Washington simply gave away licenses for free. Until 1982, it had been up to regulators to decide which companies deserved the licenses. Needless to say, the process was dominated by political pressures, outrageously expensive paperwork, and long delays. The pace of licensing lagged hopelessly behind market shifts and new technologies. After 1982, Washington awarded licenses using lotteries, with the winners free to resell licenses. Although the reform did speed up the granting of licenses, the process was still hugely inefficient — and unfair. Bidders with no intention of operating an actual telephone business spent millions to get into the game for the purpose of reaping a windfall. Further, although telephone companies were forced to pay the costs of obtaining licenses, Washington (and taxpayers) did not get the benefits of any revenues. There had to be a better way.
A young generation of game theorists, including Paul Milgrom, John Roberts, and Robert Wilson at the Stanford Bschool, came up with that better way. Their chief contribution consisted of recognizing, as Milgrom said, that “the mere design of some auction was not enough…Getting the auction design right was also critically important.” In particular, they concluded that the most obvious auction designs — auctioning licenses one by one in sequence using simultaneous sealed bids — was the way least likely to succeed in getting licenses into the hands of corporations that could use them best — Washington’s stated objective. Game theorists treat an auction like a game with rules and try to evaluate how a given set of rules, taken together, is apt to affect the bidders’ behaviour. They take stock of the options the rules allow, the payoffs to the bidders associated with the options, and bidders expectations about their competitors’ likely choices.
Why did these economists conclude that traditional auction formats would not work? Mainly because the value of each individual license to a user depends — as is the case with a Rembrandt or a Picasso — on what other licenses the user is able to obtain. Some licenses are perfect substitutes for one another. That would be the case for similar spectrum bands to provide a given service. But others are complements. That would be the case for licenses to provide paging services in different parts of the country.
“To permit the efficient license assignment, an auction must allow bidders to consider various packages of licenses, combining complements and switching among substitutes during the course of the auction. Designing an auction to allow this is quite difficult,” writes Paul Milgrom., one of the economists who designed the FCC auction of which Gore was speaking.
A second source of complexity, Milgrom says, is that the purpose of the licenses is to create businesses for new services with unknown technology and unknown consumer demand. Since bidders’ opinions are bound to be wildly divergent, it is possible that license assignment would depend more on bidders’ optimism than on their ability to create a desired service. Ideally, an auction design can minimize that problem.
As Congress and the FCC inched closer to the notion of auctioning off spectrum rights, Australia and New Zealand both conducted spectrum auctions. That they proved to be costly flops and political disasters illustrated that the devil really was in the details. In New Zealand, the government ran a socalled second price auction, and newspapers were full of stories about winners who paid far below their bids. In once case, the high bid was NZ$7 million, the second bid was NZ$5000, and the winner paid the lower price. In another, an Otago University student bid NZ$1 for a television license in a small city. Nobody else bid, so he got it for one dollar. The government expected the cellular licenses to fetch NZ$240 million. The actual revenue was NZ$36 million, oneseventh of the advance estimate. In Australia, a botched auction, in which parvenu bidders pulled the wool over the government’s eyes, delayed the introduction of pay television by almost a year.
The FCC’s chief economist was an advocate of auctions, but no game theorists were involved in the first stage of the FCC auction design. The theorists’s phones started ringing only by accident after the FCC issued a tentative proposal for an auction format with dozens of footnotes to the theoretical literature on auctions. That was how Milgrom and his colleague Robert Wilson, leading auction theorists, got into the game. Milgrom and Wilson proposed that the FCC adopt a simultaneous, multiple round auction. In a simultaneous auction, a bunch of licenses are sold at the same time. Multiple rounds means that, after the first round of bidding prices are announced, and bidders have a chance to withdraw or raise one another’s bids. This is repeated round after round until the auction is over. The chief advantage of this format is that it allows bidders to take account of interdependencies among licenses. Just as sequential, closedbid auctions let sellers discover what bidders are willing to pay for individual items, the simultaneous, ascendingbid auction lets them discover the market value of different groupings of items.
This early proposal — which the FCC eventually adopted — did not cover seemingly small but critical details. Should there be deposits? Minimum bid increments? Time limits? Should the bidding system be wholly computerized or executed by hand? And so forth. Milgrom, Roberts and another game theorist, Preston McAfee, an adviser to AirTouch, provided proposals on these issues. The FCC hired another game theorist, John McMillan, of the University of Caliofornia, San Diego, to help evaluate the effect of every proposed rule. According to Milgrom, “Game theory played a central role in the analysis of the rules. Ideas of Nash equilibrium, rationalizability, backward induction, and incomplete information, though rarely named explicitly, were the real basis of daily decisions about the details of the auction process.
By late spring 1995, Washington had raised more than USD 10 billion from spectrum auction. The press and the politicians were ecstatic. Corporate bidders were largely able to protect themselves from predatory bidding and were able to assemble an economically sensible set of licenses. It was, as John McMillan said, ” a triumph for game theory.”
***************************************************************************
PS: a triumph of pure mathematical thought !:)
Regards,
Nalin Pithwa
The importance of lines and slopes
 Light travels along straight lines. In fact, the shortest distance between any two points is the path taken by a light wave to travel from the initial point to the final point. In other words, it is a straight line. (A slight detour: using this elementary fact, can you prove the triangle inequality?)
 Bodies falling from rest in a planet’s gravitational field do so in a straight line.
 Bodies coasting under their own momentum (like a hockey puck gliding across the ice) do so in a straight line. (Think of Newton’s First Law of Motion).
So we often use the equations of lines (called linear equations) to study such motions.
Many important quantities are related by linear equations. Once we know that a relationship between two variables is linear, we can find it from any two pairs of corresponding values just as we find the equation of a line from the coordinates of two points.
Slope is important because it gives us a way to say how steep something is (roadbeds, roofs, stairs, banking of railway tracks). The notion of a slope also enables us to describe how rapidly things are changing. (To philosophize, everything in the observable universe is changing). For this reason, slope plays an important role in calculus.
More later,
Nalin Pithwa.
PS: Ref: Calculus and Analytic Geometry by G B Thomas and Finney; or any other book on calculus.
PS: I strongly recommend the Thomas and Finney book : You can get it from Amazon India or Flipkart:
or Flipkart:
101 Careers in Mathematics: Andrew Sterrett, MAA publication
https://www.maa.org/press/maareviews/101careersinmathematics
Shared by Nalin Pithwa — for spreading awareness in India also about career opportunities in maths/mathematics
More questions on applications of derivatives: IITJEE mains maths tutorial
 Prove that the minimum value of for , is .
 A cylindrical vessel of volume cubic meters, open at the top, is to be manufactured from a sheet of metal. Find the dimensions of the vessel so that the amount of metal used is the least possible.
 Assuming that the petrol burnt in driving a motor boat varies as the cube of its velocity, show that the most economical speed when going against a current of c kmph is kmph.
 Determine the altitude of a cone with the greatest possible volume inscribed in a sphere of radius R.
 Find the sides of a rectangle with the greatest possible perimeter inscribed in a semicircle of radius R.
 Prove that in an ellipse, the distance between the centre and any normal does not exceed the difference between the semiaxes.
 Determine the altitude of a cylinder of the greatest possible volume which can be inscribed in a sphere of radius R.
 Break up the number 8 into two parts such that the sum of their cubes is the least possible. (Use calculus techniques, not intelligent guessing).
 Find the greatest and least possible values of the following functions on the given interval: (i) on . (ii) on (iii) on with and (iv) on (iv) on .
 Prove the following inequalities: (in these subset of questions, you can try to use pure algebraic methods, apart from calculus techniques to derive alternate solutions): (i) for (ii) (iii) for . (iv) for (iv) for .
 Find the interval of monotonicity of the following functions: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
 Prove that if , then
 On the graph of the function where , find the point such that the segment of the tangent to the graph of the function at the point intercepted between the point M and the yaxis, is the shortest.
 Prove that for and for any positive a and b, the inequality is valid.
 Given that for all real x, and , prove that for all , and that for all .
 If for all , prove that at most once in .
 Suppose that a function f has a continuous second derivative, , , for all x. Show that for all x.
 Show that has exactly one root in .
 Find a polynomial such that . Prove that there is only one solution.
 Find a function, if possible whose domain is , , for all , , if and , if .
 Suppose that f is a continuous function on its domain and . Prove that f has at least one critical point in .
 A right circular cone is inscribed in a sphere of radius R. Find the dimensions of the cone, if its volume is to be maximum.
 Estimate the change in volume of right circular cylinder of radius R and height h when the radius changes from to and the height does not change.
 For what values of a, m and b does the function: , when ; , when ; and , when satisfy the hypothesis of the Lagrange’s Mean Value Theorem.
 Let f be differentiable for all x, and suppose that , and that on and that on . Show that for all x.
 If b, c and d are constants, for what value of b will the curve have a point of inflection at ?
 Let and Find the critical points of g on
 Find a point P on the curve so that the area of the triangle formed by the tangent at P and the coordinate axes is minimum.
 Let Find all possible real values of b such that has the smallest value at .
 The circle cuts the xaxis at P and Q. Another circle with centre Q and variable radius intersects the first circle at R above the xaxis and line segment PQ at x. Find the maximum area of the triangle PQR.
 A straight line L with negative slope passes through the point and cuts the positive coordinate axes at points P and Q. Find the absolute minimum value of , as L varies, where O is the origin.
 Determine the points of maxima and minima of the function , with , where is a constant.
 Let be a fixed point, where . A straight line passing through this point cuts the positive direction of the coordinate axes at points P and Q. Find the minimum area of the triangle , O being the origin.
 Let . Show that the equations has a unique root in the interval and identify it.
 Show that the following functions have at least one zero in the given interval: (i) , with (ii) with (iii) , with
 Show that all points of the curve at which the tangent is parallel to axis of x lie on a parabola.
 Show that the function f defined by , with has a maximum value with .
 Show that the function f defined by with has a minimum value at which and a maximum at when .
 If for all , then show that for all .
 Prove that , if .
Happy problem solving ! Practice makes man perfect.
Cheers,
Nalin Pithwa.